Australians are NOT Guilty… Neither is Ponting….

This was something that I was not going to comment on because I thought it to be something that is everyday stuff. I was clearly wrong it seems. Every cricket fan knows what happened on the field. I will start with some things.

First is, about the officials. The umpires were appointed by ICC and not Cricket Australia, so stop commenting against Australia on the matter. Indian people (I am talking about the masses and not the individual) are useless. They always talk and claim that ICC is in pocket of BCCI because 95% of the income of ICC is from BCCI. Now, we also know that Sunil Gawaskar, a former Indian cricketer is the head of the appointment of the umpires for ICC. So, don’t blame Australia for the black works of the umpires.

Now the part where Ponting said out to Ganguly. Again, this is the mistake made by umpires not Ponting. The umpire, Mark Benson asked Ponting if Ganguly was out. He said Ganguly was out. Because he believed in that. Well I don’t know what people will say of that, but I think believing in yourself and your team members is the best quality a Captain could ask for. He did that and proved that. Remember, players also see the action in the real time. That means it was a fraction of a second before that catch was taken. So, maybe Clarke thought that he had scooped that catch clearly. And Ponting believed in his teammate and said that the catch was scooped clearly. Now, again, whatever the players may say, this was shear stupidity of the umpires to ask players for decisions. If you talk about the second catch taken by Ponting while diving, first you show me other people who can dive like that and catch the ball. And then tell me how many of them are thinking about the ball not touching the ground. I mean it is stupidity to ask a player to see the ball, time the dive, catch the ball, control the emotion that he has taken it and also see if he has not accidentally brushed the ground in the process. He is not a robot. He appealed and that is what players do.

If you are against that appeal, then what would you say to your so called idol of sportsmanship Kumble appealing for LBW when the ball had clipped the bat of asking for a catch when the ball had not touched the bat in the first match when he was desperate and not getting any wicket? Why did he appeal? Do I hear words like appealing cause he ‘thought‘ it was a catch? or LBW?Why did he appeal? Shouldn’t't he have thought about the sportsmanship? Ridiculous. Indians are blinded stupidly. That appeal he did was fully appreciated. And do remember that Ponting has the best eye in international cricket today and 99% of the times, when he claims a catch it is out.

Can anyone tell me the occasions when Ponting has cheated like people are claiming now? None can. Look at his 16 year old carrier and then speak. Again, Indian players are not very good at this are they? Remember the 7th ODI match in Mumbai this year? It was Murali Karthik who had edged one to Gilly and did not go and then admitted at the presentation that he had nicked one to the keeper? Australia lost that match. Did they complain against the umpire? No they did not. Because these things happen. Similar to what Ponting and Symonds did. Why should they have walked out on those occasions? I say it again, the Umpiring was poor and action should be taken against them, bu expecting Australians to be saints is just asking for too much.

Now for the part where Harbhajan issue comes in. You know that there is a law in India that if a person , A complains against the other, B that B called A by racist comments then B is sent to jail without any other proof needed. Just on the words of A. Now it is pathetic and shameful that in a Country like this people expect ICC to not believe on what Australians have claimed against Harbhajan and his comments. Also that he was warned in the series in India for racist comments against Symonds. And even the public was part of it. So again, I think it is shameful what Indians are doing. If you have a law like that stated above, you have no right to comment against what has been going on against Harbhajan.

Indians have logged a complaint against Hogg. Because Australia logged one. Now, I don’t think that the teams are different after all. It does not matter who started. Some bloke was killing innocent people so I killed him. So I am a killer… Yeah but he started and they were all innocent people. Still, it does not change the fact that you are one to. Maybe he also started like you did. So, it does not matter that Australia were the first to log complaint, India are no different.

I agree with the former players that the matter should have been closed on the field amongst the players. But it was not. Maybe they could not solve it. Whose word do you have? Why believe in the Indian players and not the Australians? For all we know any one of them may be lying. Why always it is Ponting who lies in your eyes? Why can’t all the Indians be lying about Harabhajan being innocent? But no, no one is going to think that. For gods sake there are those stupid little Indian idols of sportsmanship, gods. Sick.

No one knows what actually happened on the field. And I don’t think that it will ever come out. Maybe it is best that the matter is handed over to ICC. The officials will handle with the facts. I admit that I was hurt and it felt bad. Not because what Ponting or the Australians did. I feel bad because they did not realize that the Indians were just as pointless as a chalk. All ’round’ thinking. They focus one point and see that one only.

My dad was telling me that I should support India because it is Nation’s pride what we are dealing with. Well, if the pride of the nation is violated by such a small inccident, I don’t want to be from this nation. No matter what, I will not support the things which have all the flaws stated above. Both the teams are guilty of the charges (same) in equal way. Bombarding against one is useless. But I don’t see people thinking like that. I guess they never will.

Aditya Shevade

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 8th, 2008 at 8:05 pm and is filed under Article, My Take, Sports. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Australians are NOT Guilty… Neither is Ponting….”

Sunil January 8th, 2008 at 9:36 pm

You know what Aditya, you are just so blinded by the love for the team, you are not thinking completely rationally. The Aussies WANTED something to screw up the confidence what the Indian players had and they did such a good job in doing that. Yeah, Bhajji might have said it, ‘coz he’s known to be an aggressive player, at times. Unfortunately, the masses do not know the full details on this. So, I can’t make a detailed comment on this.

Aditya January 8th, 2008 at 10:05 pm

Ha… See, there you go again. Thinking that Australians wanted to do that to Harabhajan. Why am I the one blinded there? Have you ever thought that they might not have that intention at all?

And I don’t understand how can commenting on Harabhajan made him lose his confidence and make racist comments, IF WE ASSUME YOU TO BE TRUE that is. How?

See, no one except the players knows what is going on or what did actually happen. As I said, I know that the Australians behaved badly and that was bad. But people are behaving like Indians were/are saints. Remember what I wrote about the Murder thing. It does not matter who started. Indians are doing the same thing by reporting Hogg. It does not change anything.

Sunil January 10th, 2008 at 8:45 am

Did you read the papers today? Kumble wanted to settle this stuff in the dressing room. But, NO. Ponting wants to do everything according the Board, ‘coz the umpires are already in the pockets! They’ll obviously back them up and press charges against Bhajji(which they have). What an a-hole Ponting is!

Aditya January 10th, 2008 at 9:18 pm

^^ Cool down. Did you read the entire article from cricinfo? It says that Ponting told him that he had already reported the incident to the officials. And EO of Cricket Australia, James Sutherland has already told that once the issue is cooled down, a meeting of the 2 captains will be held.

AND, I don’t understand where do the Umpires fit in this. Can you tell me? I mean, the Umpires sucked. Both teams and ICC has agreed on that fact. Are you suggesting that Australia had anything to do with the Umpires giving wrong decisions? If that is what you think then you are pathetic.

truely indian January 11th, 2008 at 7:30 pm

aditya you have written about that murali’s event and bhajji’s event.
1st i wlll give opinion on murali’s
1)murali kartik admitted that he had nicked and he admitted that and aussies didnt complain
one indian can say why should aussies complain when they had bagged up series with 4-1.
you said that that was ridiculous.Can you remember match between aussies and kiwis when traver chappell bowled underarm delivery?though then rule was not made ,was that not ridiculous?you wl say it was according to rule but was it true sportmanship?
And it showed that aussies can do anything for winning.
Here ponting keenly wanted to win his 16th test so he did anything for winning.
ponting said on cricinfo that i gave dravid not out ,i t showed my integrity .But it doesnt mean that you are allowed to do anything.
2) Now about bhajji’s event,it is alright that aussies complained about bhajji and proctor banned him for 3 matches but t.v. footage showed that symonds also said something to turbanator and proctor ignored tendulkar’s statement.
It showed that he was biased.
And you have written about law of racism in india .it seems that you dont have much knowledge about indian laws .that law is ATROCITY ACT.According to it anyone can complain about person who tortures him.In that case ,both sides are listened by judge .
So you already related it to bhajji’s event
3)lastly i want to say that though auussies are champions they are not favourite winners(—Sunil Gavaskar)

Aditya January 11th, 2008 at 8:07 pm

^^ 1) The Chapel incident, it was the best piece of idea I have ever seen. I am not complaining against Chapel. It’s you people who are complaining. He played according to the rules. Who wrote the rules about being a true sportsman? Playing according to the rules was just fine. No one in their right mind will say that he was not according to the spirit.

1.5) Murali Karthik,:- Symonds also admitted that he was out. And like Murali, he admitted it after the game. So, they are same. No one can complain against Symonds if they say Murali was correct. And as for winning the series, 4-1, I say Australia would also have won this test series 3-1 if the decisions were correct in the Sydney game. You cannot predict the future. So, that point is pointless.

2) Bhajji thing. How can you say 100% that Symonds was abusing and Bhajji was innocent? As I said no one except the players know what actually happened. As you said, you are true Indian, jumping to conclusions and hitting wring spots. I admit Symonds is hot headed, but if he is telling the truth about racist comments, then Bhajji should be banned. And what about the time in India when Bhajji was warned about the abuse?

You are speaking as if the Indian players are saints and Australians are criminals. You are sick. Only seeing one part of the problem. TRUE INDIAN REALLY.

3) Gawaskar… He is getting mad with the age. He also said that the subcontinental players never get credit for their playing in World Cricket. And the fact is that Yusuf received the test player of the year award. Sangakara was 1st in test rankings for about a week till he played bad and lost spot. And even today people, even I agree that Tendulkar is the best ODI batsman ever. I think this much proof is enough for everyone to grasp that Gawaskar is losing it.

AND what he said is wrong. When you win, you make enemies. He is talking about the WI team when cricket was not even 10% of what it is today. Everyone was friendly. And the fact remains that like me, there are many Australian fans. I mean, go and see the % of Indian fans, originally from Australia. And then tell me.

Aditya

Love is blind January 12th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

aditya
First about ponting, he appealed that he caught the dhoni clearly. You said he is blamless for that because he can not judge that whether that was clear or not. And Indians also appeal for bat pad lbw or pad catches, likewise ponting also appealed. BUT can you understand the difference between the watching lbws or catches and sensing the catches. Pointing took that catch very athleticaly, but any good player can say that he can judge whether it is clear or not, because he not watchin it, but sensing it. When anyone makes appeals against the lbw or close cathces he or umpire also are not clear of whether it is pad or bad. He is on eve of his 16th consecutive victory and so excited to forgot the sportmanship. Another incident when ganguly is caught by clark. It is not the umpires mistake that he ask to pointing because it was according to the pact, which was within pointing and kumble saying that in close catches players words should be taken as final. Clark said he caught gangly clearly, and so ponting. But after match also he did not make any comment that it was not clear, although all replys showing it clearly. I don’t blame ponting for telling umpire that it was out, but he did accept that it was not, after match. Where is his sportmanship ?
Now the harbhajan case. You said Indians laws are also like that. But as per your example if A complains agains B, then B get arrested only for police custody which is not punishment. If in court, which takes all the evidences, proved that he is guilty then only he is punished otherwise if evidences are not satifactory, no one can blame him. In hurbhajan case, only words of simonds and heydan are taken as proof, which is not satisfactory evidences to prove it. So, the team is decided to appeal. You think what is connection between the nation’s pride and this small incident ? Mr. Aditya Shevde this is not a small incident. A nation which is fighting against the racism in other coutries (south africa) also, a representative of it with a charge of racism, is this a small thing for you ? In this, neither punishment nor harbhajan is big but the thing that ‘ a representative of india with the blame of racist’ is of importance, so the the fight is for ‘nation’s pride’.
Next, is the complaint against the hogg. Do you remember when Atal Birhari Vajpaye did the ’shastrasandi’, against the pakistan, although the firing was active form that side. Do you want that on criket field also ? Aussies don’t wanna compromise on harbhajan’s case then why should we accecpt anything abusive from them. It is good in theory that ‘an eye for eye make whole world blind’ but it’s time is gone.
Even the precident of hall of fame has critisised ponting. The critisiem of poting is from all the world including the australians, why you blame that Indians are doing it only.
To say the least,
Love is blind.

Ratnadeep

Aditya January 12th, 2008 at 11:33 pm

As you said, it was the fault of the umpires. And what Ponting said was, he thought that the catch was clear when on the field cause he believed in Clarke. Now, as far as after the match (post match talk) he said he did nothing wrong. Which is true because players don’t get to see replays while appealing. A sad but true fact.

Same as that law you and I mentioned, Harabhajan case, his side will be heard and he has been given the chance to play. Again, all Aussies did was complain and then give their statements. The decision to listen to them and not the Indians and then ban Harabhajan was of ICC and ICC alone. Don’t blame Aussies because ICC did not listen to India.

And as I said, not all the people are same. Don’t judge the entire nation by one person. So, even if Harabhajan said something, I don’t think all Indians also automatically become like him. Likewise, we will never know what actually happened at the ground. So it is time to move on. Why the hell the entire world is fighting. The players and officials and other concerned people can take the decision for themselves.

And as for eye for eye theory. You read my article incorrectly. I never blamed India for complaining against Hogg. I am just saying that people MUST stop critisizing Aussies for complaining Harabhajan. Because both the teams have complained. So, both are the same. Why blame only the Aussies for the complaint?

And even I have critisiezed Ponting even though not in the article above, but people can tell you. What I am saying is that incidents like sacking him, calling his parents and abusing them is WRONG and one bad incident cannot make the person bad.

Aditya

Sunil January 18th, 2008 at 9:07 am

I think Truley Indian and Love is blind’s post summed up what I wanted to say. You can adore your Aussie as much as you want. Can’t debate with fanboys.

Aditya January 18th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

^^ Same here… Can’t debate with fanboys….

dhanesh February 1st, 2008 at 12:57 pm

ponting, symonds & clark they are cheaters….thats all…….

sriram June 20th, 2008 at 7:12 pm

adithya is correct. aussies cant be saints. its just tat indians cannot take defeat. ponting cannot be blamed. guess he has to bear the brunt of the world for bein the greatest captain and batsman ever.

Leave a Reply